Whose life is it, anyway?
Trait selection in babies "is a service," says Dr. Steinberg. "We intend to offer it soon."
Whoops, someone noticed that some of this reproductive technology stuff might not be ethical.
Talk about controlling parents!
Eugenics is a done deal. The cat's out of the bag. There's no going back. (Don't think about the 14th Amendment that overturned Dred Scot and took the slaves from their "owners.")
Of course, the "Progressives" and human-plus groups only commit *good* eugenics. All they want is control and more money.
The "Progressives" started raising the alarm a couple of years ago, when they were pushing for a change in the Bush embryonic stem cell policy. The logic was that the reason there is no regulation is that the government isn't paying for enough research.
At the same meetings, they were adamant that their group must
Funny, in all these links, I didn't find a single comment about the doctors who lost a discrimination suit in California for refusing to fulfill a patient's request for IVF -- even in the midst of the hulabaloo about the mother of octuplets.
HT to Vox Popoli
Labels: Artificial Reproduction, Assisted Reproduction, ethics for sale, eugenics, medical ethics, public policy, reproductive technology, research ethics
