In the same set of news alerts that notified me of the Vatican’s condemnation of cloning and embryonic stem cell research, I read that Insoo Hyun is the lead author of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) Guidelines for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells.
The Guidelines are also published on line at Cell Stem Cell and, along with a patient handbook and other supporting material, is available at the ISSCR website. Here is the link to the page containing links to pdf of the Guidelines, patient handbook, and other materials. That page also links to the Stem Cell Cell article.
The story in the Australian blurs the differences between destructive embryonic stem cell research and the non-destructive, ethical forms such as induced pluripotent stem cell research and adult stem cell research. The focus is on the former, detailing long anticipated (but not yet begun) phase 1 embryonic stem cell research, without mentioning on-going trials or previous achievements using the non-controversial cells.
The ISSCR in general and Dr. Hyun in particular, are very much advocates of embryonic stem cell research and cloning for research. Also on his task force were Laurie Zoloth and George Daley, both strong advocates of embryonic stem cell research. Daley has worked to create embryos slated for destruction in his own Harvard lab, although he has focused on non-destructive research, recently.
Dr. Hyun has a Ph.D. in bioethics and is on the faculty at Case Western University in Cleveland, Ohio. He has focused on cloning research, and his early work included assisting the Clinton Administration’s National Bioethics Advisory Committee (that would have been along with Obama transition team members, Jonathan Moreno and Robin Alta Charo) on their “secular” article on cloning. He went to South Korea with Hu Suk Wu in order to study the effects of cloning research on the Koreans – before the Korean was exposed as a fraud.
I wonder whether there was even one member of the ISSCR teamwho considers embryonic stem cell destruction unethical? And how soon will Dr. Hyun join his former colleagues in DC?
LifeEthics 
>It is amazing how many presumably educated people do not see the distinction between embryonic stem cell research and other, non-life destroying methods for obtaining stem cells. I interviewed a medical school applicant from a Catholic undergrad institution who stated that he had studied biomedical ethics and disagreed with the Catholic Church's position. I asked if there was any situation where the Church would permit stem cell research. He could not think of any! Adult stem cells, cord blood, etc not even on the radar screen of a very bright, otherwise well educated science major. I was appalled.
Posted by Anonymous | December 15, 2008, 10:54 pm>Absolutely amazing.The false dichotomy that is created by insisting on embryonic destruction is the only way to achieve stem cells or advance regenerative medicine is proven wrong every day, in the published literature. http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/2008/12/tea-bag-adult-stem-cell-treatment-for.htmlHowever, trying to get *accurate* media coverage can be difficult:http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/2008/11/trash-from-reuters-on-stem-cells.html
Posted by LifeEthics.org | December 17, 2008, 12:29 pm